Monthly Archives: July 2020

Why White Christians Should Read White Fragility

Dear white reader: how often do us white people have to be aware of our whiteness in day-to-day interactions? Of course the answer to that question will depend on our own particular social surroundings, but I bet that the vast majority of us out there don’t have to take our race into consideration all that much as we go about normal life.

By now I hope we’re all aware that such racial ease is not the experience for many non-white Americans. Why do white folk so often get to feel like their race is a non-issue when for so many others, race is an inescapable issue?

Robin Diangelo investigates this question in her book White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism. Her answer is that being white is a socially constructed racial identity that carries with it the privilege of being considered racially normal. It’s the identity of not having to have an identity; being white is the contrast to all other racial identities. As such, whiteness is integral to racism—“racism” not in the sense of discrete expressions of racial antipathy but in the sense of an “-ism”: an organizing principle of society, like capitalism or individualism. Racism organizes American society just as powerfully as these other -ism’s do.

Yet, as Diangelo points out, white people’s typical way of thinking about racism is not social, it is individual. “Racism” usually means the hostile attitudes of particular persons. That was how I used the word in that post I wrote about old relatives. (I wish I had read this book before I wrote that post!). But such usage, Diangelo argues, does our country a disservice: “racist” has become an adjective almost synonymous with “bad,” and so many well-meaning white folk are terrified at the notion of being labeled a racist. In their terror, many white people can’t handle any kind of discussion that comes close to identifying ways in which their own behavior participates in the larger social system of racism. White people escape from or destroy these discussions by shutting them down with shouty anger or sullen silence, derailing them with tears, or by stepping above them altogether by claiming to be racially “in the know” already.

Diangelo outlines no pat solutions for the ills of American society, but she does offer a way forward: the burden is on white people to examine their assumptions and to grow in ways of true (not showy) humility.

So now let’s bring this whole post around to its title: white, American Christians can benefit from reading White Fragility because doing so can increase their proficiency in the ways of humility, kindness, and love. That’s what we’re all about as Jesus Followers, right?

Here’s the deal. It can be scary to have someone say to you “examine yourself because you’re part of the problem.” No one wants to hear that. For many people, hearing that feels threatening to their very core sense of self.

But it shouldn’t feel as threatening to us Christians. We know that we’re in this sinful world and that our roots are tragically entangled with the roots of sin (I’m thinking of the Parable of the Weeds in the Wheat, Matthew 13:24-30). We also know that Jesus’s death is the atoning sacrifice for “the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:2). We should be okay with examining ourselves critically because we know that our imperfection does not impede God’s love for us.

And as Christians we should also be okay with laying aside worldly identities and allegiances. As John wrote, Christ gave us “power to become children of God.” That status—God’s Child—should be our foundation and standing on it we can decrease in our own hearts the importance of being white or American.

I was talking to someone about White Fragility recently. She asked me if I thought I would be white in heaven. As someone who has faith in the bodily resurrection of the dead, I anticipate that in the next age my immortal flesh will have the pale skin color that I have now. But that won’t mean that I’ll be “white.” Being “white” in the age I live in now carries with it a privilege that others who aren’t “white” simply don’t have. Being “white” is a crucial cog in the overall mechanism of this world’s injustice. So no, I won’t be “white” in the New Jerusalem. My body will bear the phenotype that my European ancestors gave me, sure, but that “white” thing? It’s a this world thing. Christians, who look ahead to the next world that Christ will bring at his return, should be willing to hold on loosely to the “white” thing. White Fragility can give us some pointers as to how.

What Should We Celebrate?

This past Independence Day, at the 2020 Salute to America, President Trump spoke at length about how we as Americans should regard the nation’s historical narrative. “Our past,” the President said, is an “incredible story of American progress.” The end result of all this progress, in the President’s view, is the country as it stands today: “the greatest, most exceptional, and most virtuous nation in the history of the world.” This understanding of American history is under attack, according to the President, from the “radical left” and their allies who “tear down our statues” and thus “erase our history”; the President went so far as to say that this coalition of people “are lying about history” and “want us to be ashamed of who we are.”

As I read through the President’s speech, his likening of the demolition of statues with the erasure of history caught my attention because I have heard other people, whose politics are worlds apart from Trump’s, make similar statements over the years. From what I have observed there seems to be an assumption in the minds of many that if a statue comes down it’s like saying “let’s forget about this person or event.”

Yet such an assumption falls apart when you consider that many—if not most—public statues and monuments to historical figures do more than just memorialize; they celebrate. This celebration is often conveyed without words. Think about the Jefferson Memorial in DC. Even if you had no clue who Thomas Jefferson was and couldn’t read the English language, you would still, upon walking into that structure, think to yourself “whoever this guy was he must have been pretty good, because he’s standing on a pedestal in something that looks like a temple.” Right? Perhaps I’m being unsophisticated, but I bet that’s the idea you would get.

Now consider another famous DC monument: the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. If any memorial simply reminds people of something, this one does. As far as I can reckon, the memorial’s only political statement about the Vietnam War is that it is something to be remembered, if only for the sacrifice it demanded of so many Americans—with no hint of celebration.

So what should we celebrate? That’s the real question.

In Charlottesville, Virginia, stands a statue of Robert E. Lee. If I’m remembering it right, Lee is in uniform, on his horse, on a pedestal, on a hilltop. That statue valorizes Lee. Should American society in the year 2020 continue to valorize this man who fought the US Army in an attempt to preserve slavery? I would say no. It seems, if the state of Mississippi’s recent decision to remove the Confederate battle flag from its state flag is any indicator, that many people are of a similar mind. Removing Confederate emblems from the land is a decision to stop the celebration of the Confederacy, which is not the same as forgetting it altogether.

I imagine that for some, the case to take down a statue of Lee feels worlds apart from the case to take down a statue of George Washington or Abraham Lincoln. If the idea of taking down a statue of, say, Thomas Jefferson makes no sense to you, just stay with me for a little bit longer.

Consider the President’s own words on July 4th: the heritage of America “belongs to citizens of every background and of every walk of life. No matter our race, color, religion, or creed, we are one America.” That sounds nice, doesn’t it? One big, happy, country that fully includes in its historical narrative all the different kinds of people who are here and part of “us.” But here’s the crux of the matter: if the “we” of America includes all its citizens— white, Black, gay, straight, English-speaking, Spanish-speaking, religious, non-religious, all of us—then what should we celebrate?

How that fully inclusive ‘we’ thinks about and celebrates its history is going to look different than the typical story told about the United States, the story the President champions in his Fourth of July remarks. The President said that “we will defend, protect, and preserve [the] American way of life, which began in 1492 when Columbus discovered America.” The simple fact is that if the American way of life is understood to mean the free exercise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all its citizens, then the American way of life in no way began in 1492. It actually began much more recently than that and one could argue that it hasn’t started yet. After all, the President said at Mt. Rushmore that we much “teach our children…that no one can hold them down,” but not two months ago George Floyd was held down by a police officer until he died.

So what should we celebrate?