Monthly Archives: June 2020

What to Do With Your Racist Old Relatives?

So this post gets a tad personal. It starts with a little story: several years ago, I was on a road trip with a friend of mine who is of East Asian descent (I’m white). While eating lunch at a travel plaza we started talking about our grandparents. I told him some stories about my granddad (may he rest in peace) and I couldn’t help but tell my friend—with a wince—that my grandpa was, well, kind of a racist, at least from what I saw.

In all earnestness my friend asked “how did you know?”

I had to process this question for a couple of seconds.

I asked my friend if he had ever met someone who just said blatant, forthrightly racist things on a semi-regular basis. He said no. That answer surprised me, but hey, praise God for it.

So I had to tell my friend, as best I could, how it works with the racist people that I’ve known: racist remarks, jokes, and rants just bubble out of them. It’s like they’re obsessed with racism. I told my friend how, when I was just a kid, my grandpa would tell me crude jokes that used the n-word. My grandpa would recount stories about how, according to him, Puerto Ricans were lazy. My grandpa once said, after reading an article about a civil rights issue in the newspaper, that “we paid black folks their nickel and dime back years ago.” And the last coherent thing my grandpa ever said to me—back when Obama was president—was “the President? He’s just another [n-word] from Chicago.”

But, as I told my friend over lunch, for all of my grandpa’s racist remarks, he was still my grandpa and I loved him. The man was steadfastly dependable and tender toward me. From the time I was little until into my mid-20s he would call on my birthday and sing me the birthday song over the phone. I would spend a whole week at his house in the country during summer breaks and we’d build bonfires, do target practice, and stargaze. I miss him a lot.

So it’s complicated, I said to my friend with a sigh. Wrapping up the whole bit about grandpa, I ruefully told my friend “so this is a thing that white people my age have to deal with: how do we process our grandparents’ racism?”

But as soon as I said that sentence my next thought was: why did I just say that? Because, dear white readers in your 30s, do we really really process our racist old relatives? Now, not everyone’s grandpa was throwing around the n-word with glee, I know. But I suspect that I’m not alone in having this kind of experience with one’s grandparents—not by a long shot.

Frequently, when this issue—the issue of “oh man, our grandparents were racists”—comes up in conversation among white folk the pattern of talking about it, from what I’ve seen, goes like this: someone, in a pained voice, relates some anecdote illustrating the racist thoughts of their grandparents. Another person, in a sad tone, admits that their grandparents had similar attitudes. Then someone says “it was a different era” and the conversation moves on.

The “it was a different era” summation never sits well with me. Saying that allows us in the here-and-now to feel distant from and superior to the attitudes of our predecessors. But are those attitudes so distant, really? Hopefully, in this momentous year, we white folk can all agree that racism isn’t a thing in the past—it’s around us in the here-and-now.

So here’s what I propose. It’s a simple thing, but I’m hoping it’s the type of simple thing that if repeated often enough starts some change in the right direction. White folk: next time you’re all to yourselves and the talk turns toward the “oh man—our grandparents were real racists!” topic, instead of closing the talk with “it was a different era,” how about segueing with “we got to do better than that.” The point of saying this would not be to judge or excuse the past—it would be to focus our attention on activity needed in the present. Because the world our grandparents made is still with us, and still needs to be remade. Our predecessors’ story is ours and we have to try to change the plot line through whatever means we have.

Beyond the Usual Beating: The Jon Burge Police Torture Scandal and Social Movements for Police Accountability in Chicago.

If you’re looking to learn more about the history of police brutality in Chicago, then I highly recommend Andrew S. Baer’s new book Beyond the Usual Beating: The Jon Burge Police Torture Scandal and Social Movements for Police Accountability in Chicago.

Baer, who is an assistant professor of history at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, walks the reader through the rise, fall, and aftermath of the career of Jon Burge, a Chicago police officer who tortured people of color for confessions in the 1970s and 80s. Burge, and other officers working alongside him, hooked up suspects to electric wires and shocked them, wrapped plastic bags around their heads so that they couldn’t breathe, preformed mock executions—and more. Predictably, persons in Burge’s custody confessed to crimes they did not commit. When the story of the Chicago police torture scandal broke in the early 1990s, an already existing social movement for police accountability in Illinois gained momentum. Groups such as the People’s Law Office, Citizens Alert, Black People against Torture, and the journalism program at Northwestern University sustained the political pressure that eventually brought about the conviction of Jon Burge in 2010, an end to capital punishment in Illinois in 2011, and reparations for torture survivors in 2015. While Baer tells the story of a social movement against police oppression that achieved tangible results, he is quick to point out that the tale of Jon Burge is part and parcel of a larger narrative of “racist police violence” which started long before Burge’s career and is still ongoing.

The subject matter of Baer’s book doesn’t make for easy reading, emotionally. That said, his prose is engaging and accessible; the book is one of the most plainspoken academic monographs I’ve come across. Perhaps I’m a bit biased in favor of Baer’s work—I knew the guy in grad school, and we were in the same cohort. (Andy’s cool! Read his book!)

Today, at the funeral of George Floyd, Floyd’s niece asked “when has America ever been great?” It’s stories like that of Jon Burge that form part of the context of her question. Burge was a law enforcement officer who considered himself above the law. And according to Baer, the doings of Burge and his colleagues were an open secret among cops working on the South Side and among the higher-ups in City Hall downtown. When the Chicago PD finally fired Burge in the early 1990s, he still got a pension. Let’s be honest—in a truly great place, would stuff like this happen? Now don’t get me wrong: I think this country can change for the better. There are many people who want that change, and that is a good thing about the USA. It’s just that if American society is going to change, the national self-conception will have to become something to the effect of “it hasn’t been so great, but we’re working on it.” Books like Beyond the Usual Beating can help steer American identity toward more humility.

Read More Than the Headlines

So while I’m still working on the review of Andrew Baer’s book, I had to take a moment to post about the front page of today’s Chicago Tribune (Sunday June 7, 2020). I’m kind of wondering if the Tribune meant to mislead people on purpose.

A large photo of a huge group of protestors dominates the top half of the Tribune’s front page. Underneath runs the headline “Thousands flood streets”. Underneath that headline are two smaller headlines: “Madison Street struggles to recover from unrest again” and “Police accountability focus of Union Park rally, march”.

When I first saw the sub-headline about Madison Street, I thought, “oh man. Looting again yesterday?” But no. The article was about the looting from the previous weekend. The “again” in the headline refers to the 1968 riots: Madison Street got hit then and this year too. The article about yesterday’s demonstration states that it was a peaceful march.

So I guess I’m just wondering why the Tribune staff put that sub-headline about Madison Street right where it did. Were they trying to stoke fear about unrest and in so doing prompt people to purchase a copy of the paper? Were they trying cast a shadow of doubt on the Union Park rally?

Just my thoughts as I saw the morning paper during this Fulcrum Year.

Make 2020 the Fulcrum Year

So at this point, it sure does seem like 2020 is going to be a year that Americans are going to remember for a long time. The pandemic spring has transitioned into a summer of mass protests, or so it seems here on June 5.

Today is my son’s birthday—he turns five years old. What will this country be like when he, Lord willing, becomes an adult? He’ll turn eighteen in the year 2033. I can’t believe I’m writing this, but 2033 doesn’t seem too far from now.

What if, in 2033, the collective understanding of the recent past goes something like this: “oh yeah—2020, that was when things starting changing for the better. It had a rocky start, but after the tragedy of Floyd’s murder, the momentum of history started going in the right direction. It’s not perfect now, but let me tell you, there’s a lot less racial inequality and police brutality going around.”

I truly think that at this moment right now it is possible that 2020 could become that fulcrum year. But we all got to keep moving the energy forward.

So what can I do to move it forward?

You know, I once heard a folk singer say on the radio that social change is like a teeter-totter: there’s a giant weight of injustice on one end that weighs down the plank toward the bad. All ordinary people can ever do is to put their little spoonful of good on the other end. It seems like those spoonfuls aren’t going to do anything, but after enough spoonfuls, the whole thing switches in an instant.

I guess this blog is my little spoonful. I’m just one more voice on the huge, messy internet, but here I go.

Make 2020 the Fulcrum Year.

Coming soon: a review of Beyond the Usual Beating: The Jon Burge Police Torture Scandal and Social Movements for Police Accountability in Chicago by Andrew S. Baer.